Are we at war?
That depends who you ask. If you ask most females, they probably wouldn’t even get the question. The Radical Feminist would profusely deny while giving each other knowing winks. If you ask most men, they’d probably ponder, question it and call it conflict. Many wouldn’t recognise it as war because their comprehension of the term involves guns and bombs.
A few lessons here.
- Vietnam was never a war, it was only ever conflict
- The USA and Australia got their arses handed to them in that conflict
- The NVA had a secret weapon, The Art of War by Sun Tzu. The Chinese written book on mastery of military tactics.
- USA and Australian military now use The Art of War in teaching their military, especially West Point military academy
- The easiest way to defeat any enemy is to be massively damaging them long before they realise they’re in a war
- No war is ever fully won until the enemy is too financially exhausted to consider fighting back
- Controlling your enemies finances is far easier and cheaper prior to War’s declaration
- The primary determinants of who wins a war are Troop and Equipment numbers, Manufacturing base to replace losses, Ability to control transport in the battle theatre and Comparative Financial resources
Covid-19, The Real Story?
Now, I’m not saying this is what happened, it is just a theory of mine.
If I was China and I’ve built a massive economy based upon foreign debt I now have a massive Manufacturing base and functional infrastructure but I owe a fortune for it, I can either work hard for 20 years, produce, earn, pay down the debt which is the expectation of most Left Wing governments supporting China, or NOT!
If, as China’s leaders, I decided I wanted to simply not pay that money back, it’s as simple as win a World War. I already have the population. The population is highly compliant to government control, I have the manufacturing capacity, I control the theatre to South China Seas region. The only missing puzzle piece to a guaranteed victory is my debt.
Why is comparative debt so crucial? War is always a battle of attrition, at least to some degree. The side with the highest borrowing and spending capacity can fund loss replacement. How do I deal with China’s huge debt which globally is called “The Pillars of Sand“. Two methods;
- Work hard for 20 years, produce, earn, pay down the debt
- Ensure my target enemies have equal or greater debt
All I would have to do is find a way to force other governments to spend trillions of dollars on something, essentially Non-Productive.
With China’s potential target enemies financially weakened, they can neither rebuild their old manufacturing facilities or buy more equipment. This ensures not only victory, but victory at a much lower total cost compared to a protracted war funded by wealthier countries. This strategy is truly masterful because it ensures the highest outcome with the least global destruction for the lowest possible investment.
During the course of this financial draining of enemy government’s coffers, you then start Sabre-Rattling. Every time you rattle your sabre, at very low cost, you con your enemy to spend a fortune dragging out all their big toys to show that’s not acceptable. You then just pull back, wait till the show of strength is gone then Sabre Rattle again.
All you have to do is Rinse and Repeat and you further drain the coffers.
Where did I get this?
The Art Of War.
Consider this as a possibility. I’m not saying it’s true, I’m not saying it’s untrue. This is my personal belief.
Feminism and The Art Of War
If you don’t think we’re already deep in conflict, declared or not, just like Vietnam, think again. This war has been raging, hidden in the tunnels with every officer having the same secret weapon sitting on top of their stack of Self-Help books. I have no doubt whatsoever the attacks on men, masculinty
Anyone who’s read even the first few chapters of The Art of War, will instantly recognise these behaviours, tactics and methodology used by every facet of the Radical Feminist movement, starting with one of the books primary teachings which you’ve seen exercised above
“Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
The Third and Fourth wave Radical Feminists are not about equality, they are about full license to shift the rules in a completely undefined manner. They’re using many techniques taught in The Art of War to ensure this ongoing capability.
“Therefore, just as water retains no constant shape, so in warfare there are no constant conditions.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“O divine art of subtlety and secrecy! Through you we learn to be invisible, through you inaudible, and hence we can hold the enemy’s fate in our hands.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“You can ensure the safety of your defense if you only hold positions that cannot be attacked.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Tell me if this sounds like attempting to debate feminists
“The skillful tactician may be likened to the shuai-jan. Now the shuai-jan is a snake that is found in the Ch’ang mountains. Strike at its head, and you will be attacked by its tail; strike at its tail, and you will be attacked by its head; strike at its middle, and you will be attacked by head and tail both.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Does this sound why Feminists have massively funded White Ribbon. Feminist’s Manpuppies
“If his forces are united, separate them.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“You can be sure of succeeding in your attacks if you only attack places which are undefended.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“Bravery without forethought, causes a man to fight blindly and desperately like a mad bull. Such an opponent, must not be encountered with brute force, but may be lured into an ambush and slain.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“The whole secret lies in confusing the enemy, so that he cannot fathom our real intent.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“Begin by seizing something which your opponent holds dear; then he will be amenable to your will.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“The spot where we intend to fight must not be made known; for then the enemy will have to prepare against a possible attack at several different points;” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“Be extremely subtle even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent’s fate.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“To win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment — that which they cannot anticipate.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“There are not more than five musical notes, yet the combinations of these five give rise to more melodies than can ever be heard.
There are not more than five primary colours, yet in combination they produce more hues than can ever been seen.
There are not more than five cardinal tastes, yet combinations of them yield more flavours than can ever be tasted.”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“When the enemy is relaxed, make them toil. When full, starve them. When settled, make them move.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
“If soldiers are punished before they have grown attached to you, they will not prove submissive;
and, unless submissive, then will be practically useless. If, when the soldiers have become attached
to you, punishments are not enforced, they will still be unless.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War